When baking yeast breads or brewing beer, one of the most important steps in the process is "proofing."
According to Wikipedia, "Proofing (also called proving) is a step in creating yeast breads and baked goods where the yeast is allowed to leaven the dough. This step is not often explicitly named, and normally shows up in recipes as ‘Allow dough to rise’."1 Failure to observe this step will lead to a very, very dense product.2
In brewing, "proofing" is the step of adding yeast to warm water (95°-100°F) and letting it sit for a few minutes, before "pitching" (adding) it to the wort, or unfermented beer. Improper proofing will lead to poor fermentation, and a flat beer, at best (which is still pretty bad).3
Likewise, skimping on the proofing (or proof-reading) step of blogging can lead to equally unintended results. Before you hit the "publish" button on your blog article, be sure you’ve taken a few quick and simple steps to ensure in addition to imparting good, solid information to your readers, your grammar, punctuation, spelling and general syntax are what you truly want your readers to see.
Following are some items I’ve taken from real blogs (many of them by professional bloggers) over the past few weeks. I’m not linking the sources because my intent is not to point fingers, call out anyone, or embarrass anyone. However, I hope some of these gaffes will energize you to take a few extra moments to ensure they don’t show up in your articles.
Proofreading
Read your "final draft" aloud, and listen to what you’re reading. (Better yet, have someone else proofread for you, or listen to you read. Not always practical, but if you can get help like that, use it!) This might have prevented the following:
both apps can:
- Both can post text and images together
- Both are compatible with WordPress.com and WordPress.org (aka self hosted WordPress)
- Both can add categories to posts (and recognize current ones)
- Both can delete previous posts
In each of the preceding bullets, the words both can are redundant, and detract from the presentation. By simply eliminating those words from each bullet would have improved the flow.
Redundancy is often the sign of rushing: The author is editing "in her head" as she writes, and both the original thought and the revision get typed. As a result, you see something like this:
My original plan originally was to…
Spell-checking
Spell-checking is both the simplest proofing task, and the one most fraught with potholes. First, there is no excuse for misspelling a word like professional. On my computer, it’s underlined with a squiggly red line, and bolded (and may well be on yours, too):
There are spell-check plugins available for WordPress, or you can use a text editor (for example, MS Word or Live Writer) with built-in spell-check. Firefox has a built-in spell-checker. There’s really no excuse for true misspellings to occur, yet they do.4
A couple examples (if you figuratively hear the sound of fingernails screeching on a chalkboard, I apologize in advance):
"Everything came to a hault." What?
You speak, but you do not give a speach. I see that a lot.
Possessives and Plurals
Possessives seem to be a huge bugaboo for many people; I think it all stems from the confusion between its (possessive) and it’s (the contracted form of it is). It is a pronoun: Possessive pronouns do not have an apostrophe: His, hers, its, ours, theirs.
Likewise, plural nouns do not have an apostrophe: Trains, planes, trucks, cars. On the other hand, possessive nouns do require an apostrophe: "The train’s caboose." "The plane’s wing." But not "The plane’s winged home." And for heaven’s sake, don’t ever use an apostrophe in a verb: "The plane leave’s in an hour." Yes, sadly, I’ve seen that usage, and not just once.
Use the Right Word(s)
This goes hand-in-hand with spell-checking. Simply because a word is spelled correctly doesn’t mean it’s used correctly. (And in case you’re wondering, it’s and you’re are the correct spellings in the context of this paragraph.)
Sadly, too many people really don’t know the correct words. For example, "I would of used hot water if I had any." Of course, the proper form is would have used, the past-perfect tense. Would of comes from the contracted form, would’ve. Sounds right, but isn’t, when written.
Other common misuses include their/there/they’re (usually just the first two forms get confused); your/you’re; and as noted above, its/it’s. One would think, as often as we see the confusion between "their" and "there," people would be more attuned to using the right form. One would be wrong.
Another common mistake is to interchange affect and effect. Most of the time, "affect" is a verb, and "effect" isn’t. Even when "effect" is a verb, it’s a transitive verb (meaning "a" does something to "b").
Among World of Warcraft bloggers (of whom I am one, of course) we see the common misuse of ad and add. The former is the shortened form of "advertisement" while the latter is gamer jargon for "more bad guys": "additional monsters."
Finally (I could go on a lot longer, but I’m sure neither you nor I would benefit), one that makes me grind my teeth in frustration: peek, peak, and pique.
I took a peek inside. After I peeked, my interest was piqued.
The noise reached its peak. Shortly after it peaked, it subsided.
The title of this article was enough to pique your interest. I seriously doubt it peaked your interest, though.
"Peek" is a quick look, or the act of taking a quick look. "Peak" means top, summit or apex. And "pique" as a verb means to excite or arouse. ("Pique" is also a noun, but most definitely not a synonym for peek or peak!)
Proofing: It’s more than yeast.
I know I’ve trotted out the same examples you’ve seen time and again in discussions of grammar, spelling, and proper usage. The reason is because we (and yes, I include myself!) keep making the same mistakes, time and again. I also know most of us know better, most of the time. Rarely do we make these mistakes out of ignorance ("would of" might be an exception
).
Rather, as I pointed out earlier, we get in a rush. "Finally, this article over which I’ve slaved for hours/days/weeks, is DONE!" Click "Publish." Just because you’re through writing, don’t think you’re through preparing your article for publication.
Proof it, spell-check it, and proofread it again. Just as I’m going to do, write now.5
Notes:
- Internal links to other Wikipedia citations were removed. Photographs courtesy of Wikipedia. ↩
- I hesitate to call it "bread." When we were dating, my wife baked some rolls that failed to rise properly. My college roommate and I were having a spaghetti dinner party for several couples; the very solid rolls were the unintended hit of the party! Who knew they could be party favors? ↩
- An excellent home-brewing reference can be found at http://www.ebrew.com/. ↩
- Live Writer didn’t like Firefox so I added it to the dictionary. If the word is right and the squiggly line isn’t, add the word to your spell-checker’s dictionary. This is especially true for jargon and specialty terms. ↩
- If "write" didn’t throw you, bookmark this article and reread it soon.
↩




I’m afraid to post a comment because you’ll flame me for spelling something wrong… Anyway,
since english is not my native language I’m usually hoping my readers forgive me for my mistakes.
And you’re right, many bloggers make the same mistakes over and over again (even I notice it!). But I think post formatting is a bigger problem: if the post looks like a wall of text I simply stop reading at the first paragraph. With 250+ blogs in my reader I can skip a post every now and then; it can talk about World War III for all I care, but if it doesn’t catch my attention I won’t read it.
Horns´s last blog post: l2pvp: Fakecasting
Two excellent points, Horns. First, I should have established that if you’re working in a language that isn’t native to you, then you should be forgiven for many “errors.” I give a lot of props to people who at least make the effort!
Second, the “wall of text” (yep, I’m guilty of it too) can definitely be off-putting. I try very hard to avoid that, and I think I did okay with this article.
Well you hit right on the head of my biggest problem: “There and Their”. No matter how many times I proofread my blog post I still manage to screw it up at least a couple of times a week.
As for the previous comment about formatting I think that is something that comes about as a blog matures. My blog is still very new and I am still experimenting with different formats to see how they feel to me and how they look in the blog template. I read about 100 blog’s on a regular basis so I know what I like but the matter of putting them to use in my blog is still a problem. As your blog matures and your readers grow I think first you come into a style of your own for formatting, and secondly your readers know what to expect when they come to your site. Not to say I disagree with the “wall of text” comment, but I think a lot of blogs (mine included) have some post that are indeed exactly that and it is only as we mature as bloggers that we realize our past mistakes.
LittleHonors
LittleHonors´s last blog post: Warrior Out of Retirement ?
My sentences tend to get wordy, so I try to keep my paragraphs short–2 or 3 sentences. That introduces more white space. Some posts (like this one) naturally lend themselves to internal headings. If you can find ways to break up text that way, it definitely helps not only the appearance of the article, but the ease with which your audience can follow your discussion.
As you’ve said, these have been trotted out and explained so many times. But as people to continue to make the mistakes, I guess they all bear repeating.
And thanks – I think you’ve just handed me the key to remembering the difference between affect and effect. And no, that’s not my normal method, which is just to avoid using them.
Avonar´s last blog post: Redemption of the Fallen
“It won’t have any affect on how you write, anyway.” Right?
(It’s wrong, btw!)
The Laws of Irony firmly state that anyone telling others how to improve their grammar will inevitably make a grammatical error in the process. Nobody is exempt!
In each of the preceding bullets, the words “both can” are redundant, and detract from the presentation. By simply eliminating those words from each bullet would have improved the flow.
Eliminate the second comma from the first sentence.
Remove “by” from the second sentence.
Note that I myself am not exempt from said Law of Irony, and that you therefore cannot help but find an error in this post!
Heheh…see my reply to Ess re: commas. And that second sentence didn’t look right as I proofed it, but I did NOT read it out loud. Had I done so, I’d have caught the “by”. Just another example of “editing in my head.” Good catches!
I proofread the heck out of my entries before posting, but I’ve found that nothing highlights a mistake so well as viewing it through your feed reader once you’ve already posted it. I don’t know why. I always find at least one or two things that need tweaking through that interface.
I’d guess that my worst offense is extraneous commas. I remove a lot of the extras during proofreading, but I’m sure I drove the sticklers crazy with the extra ones that remain!
Ess´s last blog post: A Poxic Post-Mortem
I’m a commaholic too. I also try to go through and eliminate the word “that” as much as I can.
Very well written, Kestrel. I love the relation to baking and brewing!
Commas and semi-colons are a favorite of mine; generally, I catch most of my other errors.
I must admit, though, that last night, GW had a role play meeting [Feathermoon]. There was this one really outspoken member [who I didn't like due to the issue she kept coming back to] who was really, really irking me. Why? Every single “there” she used was wrong. All of the times she had to use that word, she really needed to use “their”… I was over at a friend’s, and he heard me blow up at my screen.
For goodness sake, people. It is hardly difficult, and, along with being highly distracting for those who like grammar, their words may be read less.
Homophones are fun… but not fun to abuse.
Lin [EG]´s last blog post: [ WotLK ] :: Devastating Powers of Typhoon
Nothing irks me more than when I mistype "there" for "their" (or one I didn’t include, "too" instead of "to"). On the latter, I’m convinced it’s because I type too fast, and that extra "o" sneaks in there.
Great post! I love the analogy to baking!
And it reminded me that I certainly need to proofread more. I’m very much the “oh thank god it’s done!” – (PUBLISH) type of blogger.
Isisxotic´s last blog post: Gear Plan – WotLK Edition
Visited your site last week, in fact.
And I certainly didn’t see anything that jumped up and grabbed me by the throat, so you must be doing it mostly right!